HERE

Posts tagged “news”

“4/03/2009, 12:26pm EST”

Permalink | Comments (View)

“3/24/2009, 3:06pm EST”

As the Ringling Bros. circus comes to town this week, the NY Times looks into the show’s bottom line. Unfortunately, the article barely acknowledges the abuse inherent in confining and breaking wild animals into submission. Even then, non-human suffering, and the human opposition it has inspired, is posed as little more than a business challenge. Between the lines, it does make clear that Ringling Bros. and its corporate operators are much more interested in profits than non-human animal or planetary health — no surprise there.

During the recently-concluded trial in which animal welfare groups filed suit against Ringling Bros. for systematically harming members of an endangered species (Asian elephants), Ringling Bros. CEO Kenneth Feld testified that all of the company’s elephant handlers strike these elephants with bull hooks. All parties agree that blunt, tearing trauma is required to force them to reliably tow a completely unnatural line.

As a federal judge mulls his decision for or against Ringling’s abusive business model, the circus has gone on tour, and public education can still have an impact. Several anti-circus-abuse demonstrations are taking place in NYC to educate potential circus-goers. The first will be this Thursday at 6:00pm at MSG to coincide with opening night. The more people who show up, the greater the social pressure will be not to support this cruelty.

Permalink | Comments (View)

“3/12/2009, 10:02am EST”

I’m not gonna say it on TV.

That’s Jim Cramer, host of CNBC’s Mad Money with Jim Cramer (and real-world Gordon Gecko), while he discusses “the way the market really works.” There are plenty of gems in the video below, including:

What’s important when you’re in that hedge fund mode is to not do anything remotely truthful, because the truth is sold against your view, and it’s important to create a new truth, to develop a fiction. …

The great thing about the market is it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual stocks. …

I think it’s important for people to recognize that the way the market really works is to hit the brokerage houses with a series of [future] orders that can push [a stock] down, then leak it to the press, and then get it on CNBC — that’s also very important. And then you have a vicious cycle down. It’s a pretty good game, and it can be played for a percent or two.

Wow. Enjoy. (And I’m just going to say: We. Told. You. So.)

(video via Turkana’s diary on DailyKos)

Permalink | Comments (View)

“3/11/2009, 3:25pm EST”

Sen. Schumer, gasbag

The EPA is finally moving towards requiring large industrial greenhouse gas emitters to monitor and report their emissions. Despite the fact that factory torture-and-death farms — excuse me, “industrial livestock producers” — are the biggest contributors to climate change, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has introduced bill S. 527 to exempt them from the EPA’s rules.

The rationale here is to protect these corporations — they’ll play up the “family farm” language, but don’t be fooled — from ever having to pay for the damage they cause to everyone, which could put them out of business. You see, the problem is not that they’re polluting so much; it’s that if everyone finds out how much they pollute — i.e., how truly unsustainable their activities are ecologically and economically — then they might have to shut down. And (gasp!) people might even find themselves cutting back on their artery-clogger intake.

It’s clear from the evening news that Schumer is a gasbag, but until now all we had to do was listen to him speak. Call his office at 202-224-6542 to register your opposition to S. 527.

(info via Mary Max)

| Permalink | Comments (View)

“2/25/2009, 3:02pm EST”

SOTU responses are usually a little awkward, but this entrance was just silly. And then the actual content of the speech dwarfed both the entrance and the unwitting Kenneth the Page impersonation in absurdity.

via TPM

Permalink | Comments (View)

“2/23/2009, 12:50pm EST”

…intolerant of civilization.

The latest New York Times Magazine featured an article highlighting some people’s efforts to lead the whooping crane back to historical nesting grounds, which were originally abandoned due to human intrusion. The subtitle of the article as it appears on the website is as follows:

People are taking to the skies to lead the endangered birds on their annual migration. Is the only remaining way of saving the natural world to stage-manage it?

The article goes on to say:

The whooping crane is reclusive and headstrong — it demands a square mile around its nest to itself — and consequently was one of the first birds to suffer as humans crowded into North America. In a 1946 article in The New York Times, a spokesman for the U.S. Wildlife Service, which was then going through considerable trouble on the species’s behalf — much of it for naught — called the whooping crane “intolerant of civilization.” The article went on to blame the crane’s “lack of cooperation” for its looming extinction.

First rhetorical question: I suppose the author of that article would be rather “intolerant,” and might express “a lack of cooperation,” in the event that someone or some force swooped in and made it impossible for him to live?

Second: Who in their right mind believes that humans can “stage-manage” nature? Actually, the only long-term strategy for “saving the natural world” is to get out of the way as quickly as possible. The quote above about the whooping crane being “intolerant of civilization” seems entirely rational to members of the cult of civilization, and thus it is entirely backwards: it is civilization that is intolerant of the whooping crane, and of nature at large. The whooping crane, for example, was able to survive alongside lots of other species, all of which jockeyed intensely for a limited pool of resources. Yet it was the onslaught of one species and its peculiar way of life — marked especially by a moral orthodoxy in which mutilation, torture, and eradication of non-humans comprise acceptable tactics for satisfying personal conveniences — that quickly destroyed the whooping crane’s way of life.

It is obvious that persistent adherence to our cult of civilization will continue a relentless assault on nature that has already decimated the quantity and quality of life on Earth. Morally, we cannot undo the evils we have committed. But, we can just stop. We must clean up what we can (such as the twice-United States-sized “plastic soup” swirling in the middle of the Pacific Ocean); close down and leave our factories, never to return; systematically depopulate; and return to a way of life that does not philosophically elevate humans to god status. For we are anything but gods — whether in terms of understanding, power, or mortality — and we have seen what happens when we believe otherwise.

Permalink | Comments (View)

“2/19/2009, 1:31pm EST”

Conan O’Brien gets shafted

The Times has a piece on Conan O’Brien’s impending move to the Tonight Show, currently helmed by Jay Leno and starting at 11:35. This seems the natural progression: The late late nighter puts in his dues (hilarity ensues for 16 years), and then gets promoted to late night.

But there’s a complication: Leno, instead of gracefully exiting the stage, is taking the 10pm slot, effectively continuing Conan’s run as second fiddle. As Warren Littlefield, “NBC’s top program executive when Mr. Leno began in 1992,” stated:

“Sure, Conan is still getting the ‘Tonight Show,’ but who are we kidding? Call it what you will. But if NBC hasn’t done it yet, you know they are going to at some point be saying: ‘Late night begins at 10 o’clock.’”

Meanwhile, Leno certainly isn’t doing anything to keep that from happening. According to the article, “Mr. Leno made clear in an interview in December that he envisions his show as another late-night entity, despite the prime-time location.”

Relevant question: Does anyone deny that Conan O’Brien is the funniest late night host? No, wait - does anyone deny that Conan is by far the funniest late night host? I wish Leno (and NBC) would get out of the way.

| Permalink | Comments (View)

“2/10/2009, 4:49pm EST”

Many happy returns

Via the Times of London, Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe’s 85th-birthday-celebration wish list:

  • 2,000 bottles of champagne — Moët & Chandon and ‘61 Bollinger
  • 500 bottles of whisky — Johnny Walker Blue Label, 22-year-old Chivas
  • 8,000 lobsters
  • 100kg king prawns
  • 3,000 ducks
  • 4,000 portions of caviar
  • 8,000 boxes of Ferrero Rocher
  • 16,000 eggs
  • 3,000 cakes — chocolate and vanilla
  • 4,000 packs of pork sausages
  • 500kg cheese
  • 4,000 packets of crackers

  • The Times report focuses on the surreal nature of this kind of excess in an extremely poor country. It takes no stock of the obscenity of degrading and ending thousands of non-human lives merely to indulge deluded human egos.

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    “2/10/2009, 2:20pm EST”

    KFC’s secret recipe, part deux

    A while back I posted a quote from KFC President Roger Eaton:

    I don’t want to be the president who loses the recipe. Imagine how terrifying that would be.

    This quote was in the context of updates KFC was making to the security protections in place for their secret, original handwritten fried chicken batter recipe. In that post, I pointed out that Roger Eaton presides over a company that causes more terror than Mr. Eaton will ever have to worry about experiencing in his entire life.

    Well, it looks like KFC’s security updates are complete, and thus the AP must write an article informing us about it. Hilariously, it turns out that security consultant Bo Dietl — yes, this Bo Dietl (it’s worth watching to the end):


    — is their security guru. I hope he’s put a lot of thought into how they ought to protect the recipe.

    Because then they would surely lose it, and I would take great satisfaction in that.

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    “1/27/2009, 12:48pm EST”

    Another “solution” fails to live up

    From The Times:

    The parasite that causes the deadliest form of malaria is showing the first signs of resistance to the best new drug against it.

    Combination treatments using artemisinin, an antimalaria drug extracted from a plant used in traditional Chinese medicine, have been hailed in recent years as the biggest hope for eradicating malaria from Africa, where more than 2,000 children die from the disease each day.

    Now a series of studies, including one recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine and one due out soon, have cemented a consensus among researchers that artemisinin is losing its potency here and that increased efforts are needed to prevent the drug-resistant malaria from leaving here and spreading across the globe.

    We have every reason to fear that we will approach this escalating malaria problem in familiar ways: Someone will find a new drug to which malaria is less resistant, and to which it will become more resistant. Malaria will become a stronger, deadlier disease. Meanwhile, global warming, caused by our “solutions” to so many other “problems,” will allow malaria-bearing mosquitoes to spread in number and geography, endangering previously safe human and non-human animal populations.

    As David Ehrenfeld so persuasively argues in The Arrogance of Humanism, man’s “solutions” are nearly always larger problems waiting to happen. That is why, despite all our self-congratulating talk of “progress” — social, scientific, medical, technological — we have more and larger problems today than ever before.

    Why are our “solutions” almost always problems? Because we humans by and large fail to consider the vastly larger stretches of reality extending beyond immediate human concerns. We fail to realize that, in the absence of much knowledge about the ramifications of our actions, we are very likely to do ultimate harm that is at least commensurate with the scope of our meddling. For when we fail to abide by reality, we are unable to account for the effects of what we do. (Incidentally, this is why the justification of ontological beliefs is essential for the justification of moral ones.)

    If we are going to continue to meddle with nature, we need to significantly alter our criteria for calling things “problems” and “solutions.” We can begin by broadening the context within which we consider seeming problems and solutions, because — until we take into account long-term, encompassing issues and extensions — we simply aren’t dealing with reality, and are therefore likely to offend it.

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    “1/13/2009, 5:24pm EST”

    PETA’s new campaign: Fish = “Sea Kittens”

    Reporting from Unalaska, Alaska (that’s right: UnAlaska, Alaska), NPR’s Anne Hillman writes about PETA’s new campaign to re-brand fish as “sea kittens.” The campaign seeks to publicize the reality that fish have mental, social, and nervous capacities rivaling common household pets. As PETA campaign coordinator Ashley Byrne notes:

    “Fish not only have the same ability to feel pain as a dog or a cat, but they also communicate with one another. They have complex social interactions; they form bonds; they express affection by gently rubbing against one another.”

    Taking her journalistic integrity very seriously, Ms. Hillman can’t leave it at the facts; she must seek out the other side. So she asks some children what they think, and not just any children, mind you:

    In the small fishing town of Unalaska, population just under 4,000, some people see the campaign differently.

    “I don’t see fish as sea kittens; I see them as food,” says 12-year-old Chastity Haskins.

    Haskins is looking at the PETA site with her friend, Harmony Wayner, 11.

    “It just doesn’t look right,” Harmony says. Harmony, the fourth generation of a commercial fishing family, looks at the cartoon fish and reads through the information on the site. “They say that [fish are] intelligent, but they’re not really,” Harmony says. “They have tiny, tiny little brains. Very miniature.”

    Of course, there are other factors besides brain size that determine mental capacity — for example, structural sophistication — so I really do wonder if little Harmony has her credentials in order. And I’m not sure Harmony would want to say that her smarter classmates should be able to exercise a certain degree of control over her life and well being, simply because they’re smarter.

    Humorously, the kids sound about as smart as the adults, as quoted in the article:

    “I don’t understand how it makes sense,” says fisheries observer Mary Powers, who works on fishing boats to collect data on the catches. She thinks the campaign, which encourages people to petition the Fish and Wildlife Service to stop the hunting of sea kittens, is misguided. “It seems like it’s discouraging Americans to buy our product, which I think is unpatriotic.”

    One can easily imagine Ms. Powers as a devoted hockey mom, but I digress. There’s also National Marine Fisheries Service management biologist Brian Dixon, who doesn’t think the campaign will be effective:

    “Well, it may raise some money for PETA, but I don’t think it’ll change the way we manage the fisheries,” Dixon says. “I think I may eat some sea kittens tonight.”

    You’re a good person, Mr. Dixon. Thoughtful too.

    Now, I don’t pretend to know that the SeaKittens campaign will be effective, but I have to admit PETA’s done an amazing job on the website, where you can build your own fish. Speaking of which, meet HEREball:

    Get it? HEREball?

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    “1/07/2009, 12:05pm EST”

    In the wake of the huge Dec. 24th coal ash spill in Tennessee, the NY Times has taken a wider look at 1300 coal waste dumps around the country and the policies that govern them. Wouldn’t you know it: regulation is extremely sparse, and pollution — lead, arsenic, mercury, and other toxic heavy metals — is very high.

The lack of uniform regulation stems from the E.P.A.’s inaction on the issue, which it has been studying for 28 years. In 2000, the agency came close to designating coal ash a hazardous waste, but backpedaled in the face of an industry campaign that argued that tighter controls would cost it $5 billion a year. (In 2007, the Department of Energy estimated that it would cost $11 billion a year.) At the time, the E.P.A. said it would issue national regulations governing the disposal of coal ash as a nonhazardous waste, but it has not done so.

And this is how the U.S., one of the more regulated industrial powers, has dealt with its coal waste…

    In the wake of the huge Dec. 24th coal ash spill in Tennessee, the NY Times has taken a wider look at 1300 coal waste dumps around the country and the policies that govern them. Wouldn’t you know it: regulation is extremely sparse, and pollution — lead, arsenic, mercury, and other toxic heavy metals — is very high.

    The lack of uniform regulation stems from the E.P.A.’s inaction on the issue, which it has been studying for 28 years. In 2000, the agency came close to designating coal ash a hazardous waste, but backpedaled in the face of an industry campaign that argued that tighter controls would cost it $5 billion a year. (In 2007, the Department of Energy estimated that it would cost $11 billion a year.) At the time, the E.P.A. said it would issue national regulations governing the disposal of coal ash as a nonhazardous waste, but it has not done so.

    And this is how the U.S., one of the more regulated industrial powers, has dealt with its coal waste…

    Permalink | Comments (View)

    “12/29/2008, 9:53am EST”

    On the ground at the TVA spill

    Dave Cooper details some of his experiences on the ground in the wake of the massive Tennessee Valley Authority coal ash spill.

    It’s hard to comprehend the enormous size of this spill. TVA’s coal ash mountain was stacked over 50 feet high — as high as a 5 story building.

    If a dump truck can hold 20 cubic yards of dirt and ash, it will take 265,000 truck loads to haul away all the ash (they are taking it back to the power plant). If they fill one dump truck trip every 5 minutes and work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, it will take about 2.5 years to clean up the spill. TVA has been telling the media it will be cleaned up in about 6 weeks - this is a ludicrous claim.

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    “12/26/2008, 8:30pm EST”

    1 BILLION (not 300 million, as originally reported) gallons of coal ash slurry spilled in Tennessee on Wednesday, covering hundreds of acres of woodlands and rivers in sludge up to a few feet thick. The New York Times published a well-researched article on the spill covering toxicity, human health, and “the environment”. I’ve only seen one piece, from a non-mainstream news source, on the damage to the countless non-human residents of the affected area. Overall, major news outlets are once again catering to our culture’s latent humanism-speciesism, giving precedence to the altered foundation of a single human home over the thousands and thousands of vital non-human interests snuffed out in the sludge. Environmental damages are mentioned in relation to human health alone.

    Meanwhile, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) — federally-owned and mandated electricity provider to the region — shows more interest in covering its ass than in acknowledging the ecosystemic damage of a massive spill that happened under their watch.

    Permalink | Comments (View)

    “12/18/2008, 12:17pm EST”

    Paul Weyrich dies

    Paul Weyrich was the founder of the Heritage Foundation, a rightwing institution dedicated to advancing “liberty” — for individuals and corporations who wish to pollute, destroy, and usurp the commons for their own gain, and do it all behind closed doors.

    According to Weyrich’s comrade-in-arms Grover Norquist:

    Paul Weyrich created institutions and networks that incubated new and old powerful policies and strategies to advance liberty. … He brought leaders of various freedom impulses together. Most of the successes of the Conservative movement since the 1970s flowed from structures, organizations, and coalitions he started, created or nurtured. Paul also lived a balanced life with work, family and his faith. We will miss his puns and wisdom and hard work.

    Gosh, I hope my friends mention a knack for puns when giving my eulogy.

    | Permalink | Comments (View)

    order HERE's debut album: pastpresentfuture
    HERE on FacebookHERE on TwitterHERE on YouTubeHERE on MyspaceHERE on Flickr

    Welcome to HERE.am, the official blog of the band HERE. Founded by twins Dan and Matt Mims, HERE executes harrowing, audience-shocking post-rock music and fine discourse.

    Read about us. If you like, please sign up to receive occasional HERE updates. For press inquiries, please email Dan or visit our media resource page. For booking, please email Matt.


    Paper Magazine says: "Precise percussion, tight guitar... There’s no denying their skill."

    Christopher Arnott says: "Intricate songs... 'the running, climbing, swimming, flying' [♫♫] is a staggering style collage encompassing all the activities of its title, unified by tireless drums and guitars."

    OurStage says: "From the U2’s of the world right on down to more underground outfits like HERE, artists are making a difference globally and locally through music."













    Band email
    Never leave home without it.

    ANIMAL & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

    MUSIC

    POLITICS + ECONOMICS

    LAW

    SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY

    LOCAL NEWS + EVENTS

    AMUSEMENT